NASA researchers demonstrate the ability to fuse atoms inside room-temperature metals.
"But researchers at NASA’s Glenn Research Center have now demonstrated a method of inducing nuclear fusion without building a massive stellarator or tokamak. In fact, all they needed was a bit of metal, some hydrogen, and an electron accelerator.The team believes that their method, called lattice confinement fusion, could be a potential new power source for deep space missions."
from:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/en ... t-included
(This is not "drive" power but a possible source of internal power )
Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion
Moderators: joe, Brian, Guy Fennimore
Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion
Brian
52.3N 0.6W
Wellingborough UK.
254mm LX90 on Superwedge, WO ZS66SD, Helios 102mm f5 on EQ1, Hunter 11x80, Pentax 10x50
ASI120MC Toucam Pros 740k/840k/900nc mono, Pentax K110D
Ro-Ro roof shed
52.3N 0.6W
Wellingborough UK.
254mm LX90 on Superwedge, WO ZS66SD, Helios 102mm f5 on EQ1, Hunter 11x80, Pentax 10x50
ASI120MC Toucam Pros 740k/840k/900nc mono, Pentax K110D
Ro-Ro roof shed
Re: Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion
Brian
I'm not really into space-flight. Do I take the last line (in brackets) of your post, to mean that Lattice Confinement Fusion can only be used for energy needed inside a spacecraft such as that needed just operate the spacecraft ?
Best of luck from Cliff
I'm not really into space-flight. Do I take the last line (in brackets) of your post, to mean that Lattice Confinement Fusion can only be used for energy needed inside a spacecraft such as that needed just operate the spacecraft ?
Best of luck from Cliff
Re: Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion
Hello Cliff.
Yes you are correct in that the "claim" for this method of energy production is that it could potentially provide the internal power requirements of a spacecraft (life-support, computing, navigation etc.).
Power for a main drive is not claimed, but neither has a working internal power unit been produced as yet .
We still have a long wait for a warp drive
best regards,
Yes you are correct in that the "claim" for this method of energy production is that it could potentially provide the internal power requirements of a spacecraft (life-support, computing, navigation etc.).
Power for a main drive is not claimed, but neither has a working internal power unit been produced as yet .
We still have a long wait for a warp drive

best regards,
Brian
52.3N 0.6W
Wellingborough UK.
254mm LX90 on Superwedge, WO ZS66SD, Helios 102mm f5 on EQ1, Hunter 11x80, Pentax 10x50
ASI120MC Toucam Pros 740k/840k/900nc mono, Pentax K110D
Ro-Ro roof shed
52.3N 0.6W
Wellingborough UK.
254mm LX90 on Superwedge, WO ZS66SD, Helios 102mm f5 on EQ1, Hunter 11x80, Pentax 10x50
ASI120MC Toucam Pros 740k/840k/900nc mono, Pentax K110D
Ro-Ro roof shed
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:32 am
- Location: New Farnley, Leeds lat 53.8N long 1.6W
- Contact:
Re: Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion
Very Interesting Chaps. Perhaps lattice confinement modules could be implanted in pigs to enable them to achieve powered flight in the not too near future. Unkind thoughts, Bob.
Re: Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion
Hi Bob,
I take it from your scepticism that you remember the "cold fusion" (fiasco?) of the last century?
regards,
I take it from your scepticism that you remember the "cold fusion" (fiasco?) of the last century?

regards,
Brian
52.3N 0.6W
Wellingborough UK.
254mm LX90 on Superwedge, WO ZS66SD, Helios 102mm f5 on EQ1, Hunter 11x80, Pentax 10x50
ASI120MC Toucam Pros 740k/840k/900nc mono, Pentax K110D
Ro-Ro roof shed
52.3N 0.6W
Wellingborough UK.
254mm LX90 on Superwedge, WO ZS66SD, Helios 102mm f5 on EQ1, Hunter 11x80, Pentax 10x50
ASI120MC Toucam Pros 740k/840k/900nc mono, Pentax K110D
Ro-Ro roof shed